This article reveals how the size of Gaza compares to various U.S. states, offering a clear perspective on its geographical dimensions.
Key takeaways:
- Gaza is about 365 square kilometers in size.
- Gaza is nearly 11 times smaller than Rhode Island.
- Gaza’s population is about 2 million people.
- Gaza has a higher population density than Vermont.
- Gaza’s small size and dense population create unique challenges.
Geographic Dimensions of Gaza
Gaza, formally known as the Gaza Strip, stretches over a narrow piece of land along the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea. Its landmass is quite compact, extending about 41 kilometers in length and only 6 to 12 kilometers in width. This region, despite its modest area of approximately 365 square kilometers, is densely populated and heavily urbanized, making it one of the most densely populated territories on the planet. The small area presents significant living and economic challenges for its inhabitants.
Relative Size of Gaza Compared to Rhode Island
At roughly 360 square kilometers, the Gaza Strip is a small land area on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea. To put it into perspective for those familiar with U.S. geography, the State of Rhode Island spans about 4,001 square kilometers. This means Gaza is nearly eleven times smaller than Rhode Island, highlighting its compact nature. Despite its small size, Gaza’s geographical position and dense population create a distinct geopolitical landscape that vastly differs from the more expansive, less densely populated Rhode Island. This contrast provides meaningful insights into the challenges faced by densely populated territories.
Population Comparison Between Gaza and a U.S. State
Gaza, with a population of about 2 million people, is densely populated. In contrast, Vermont, a small U.S. state in terms of area, has approximately 623,000 residents. This stark difference highlights Gaza’s high population density, which impacts everything from housing to infrastructure. Despite its compact size, Gaza’s demographic setup poses unique challenges, akin to those faced by larger but more sparsely populated U.S. states. This discrepancy between size and population illuminates varying urban planning and resource allocation issues faced by different regions.
